Skip to main content

Solutions to Ageism and Illism in the Labor Market

The Root of the Problem
The problem of ageism in the labor market stems from the connection of employment and health insurance. Most of the full-time employment in the United States includes health insurance as part of the benefit package given to employees. Why is this the case? This is the case because there is a lower tax burden on employers and employees if part of the normal salary is given in the form of health insurance instead of cash. This is a problem because as people age their risk for health problems increase, which in turn cause the cost to employers to increase, which provides an incentive for employers to discriminate against old or those with poor health.

Solution #1
Simply end the tax benefit that is given to health insurance. This would lead to the current wages paid in terms of health care to instead be paid in terms on money.

Solution #2
Legalize discrimination. How could this help the situation? This could help the situation by enabling employers to either reduce the pay of those in ill health, or an employer could simply state a policy of giving increased wages to the old instead of health insurance. Currently either of the two forms of discrimination I have described is so obviously illegal that they would never occur under current laws. This leads employers to hurt the old and ill even more by firing them completely, something that is easier to explain away on other grounds.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bargaining as a Form of Rent Seeking

The goal of many economists is to increase the size of the pie.  By this we mean that we want to increase the degree to which everyone in an economy gets what he/she wants. In a free enterprise economy, the incentive to gain wealth for oneself (the size of your slice of the pie) is in sync with the desire many economists have to increase the total size of the pie itself. This was most famously exemplified by Adam Smith within  the Wealth of Nations in 1776 when Smith talked about the invisible hand, leading producers thinking about only their own self interest to serve the common good. When an actor in the economy gains by decreasing the size of the pie we economists call this rent seeking , and although hard-line members of the Austrian school would disagree, it is possible for rent seeking to occur without an initiation of force or fraud being present. An example of rent seeking I have been thinking of is that of bargaining. When a seller, Joseph, sells a computer for $50...

Elon Musk's SpaceX Overconfidence Quantified to Enable the Computation of Realistic Predictions

Abstract Elon Musk makes a lot of wild predictions, and if you haven’t noticed he often doesn’t meet his own deadlines. In this article I compute numerically how inaccurate his predictions are when it comes to SpaceX and Tesla, so we can adjust his predictions to enable more accurate forecasting. SpaceX Elon Musk made launch rate predictions of 20 SpaceX launches in 2017 and 30 SpaceX launches in 2018. Only 18 launches occurred in 2017 and 21 in 2018. This is a growth overestimation rate of 25% and 33% respectively for the two years, or an average overestimation of 29%. SpaceX Implications Elon Musk has stated intentions to send cargo missions to Mars by 2022, and a tourist mission to the Moon by 2023. Accounting for his overconfidence you can estimate that Musk will likely actually go to Mars by November 2023 and the Moon by March 2025. References https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdUX3ypDVwI https://www.spacex.com/missions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zu7WJD8vpAQ